- This topic has 26 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 9 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Dedicated to the preservation of the legacy of this uniquely American brand
Home › Forums › Looking for Parts › Almost completed Apollo 6
Tagged: Irving Kaye table restored
I sent an email to Stephen. Let see what he has to say
I can post it on Ebay. I already have an account. I would post it at “buy it now” for $11 plus free ship. Ebay has to take their 10%. That would give us our anonymity from the knucleheads
Let me know when it’s posted on Ebay & I will take it from there.
Will post it tonight at 8est. seller will be chiro99
Just listed item… Irving Kaye Monarch coin op
Thank you
Hello, just found this website. Acquired a table that was left by a previous house owner . I believe it is an Apollo. It has a single quarter coin. Any idea how to find out the year? I have a serial number I think. Here are some pics. Great info on this site by the way.
From the Irving kaye timeline on this website.
1969
Products Include:
Apollo – NEW! Coin-op pool table
Aluminum Legs
86″, 92″, 102″, 105″
Black/Gold, Red/White
Read Article”We inspired NASA to use the Apollo name, not the other way around.”-Howard Kaye
At least you know when they started producing them. Your table looks in good shape yet. RV trim works very well to cover the bolts that fasten the bumpers.(a tip from one of the forum members)
It does look decent, the prior owner screwed in hinges to the access door on The side.
I plan to do the RV trim to cover the side bolts. The bolt covers for the top rail some are missing and others in bad shape. I plan to buy these to replace them all;
http://www.muellers.com/Push-in-Rail-Sight-for-3and4-Hole,2379.html
Any thoughts ?
I can take some pics of my mechanism that holds the access door and post them if you would like. I think it would fairly easy to reconstruct it with parts from your local hardware store.
Looks very nice!
We have never been able to find any rhyme or reason to the SN’s. I suspect they were “designed” to make it look like they produced fewer tables so in case they were ever audited they would have plausible deniability.