Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Valero
ParticipantValero
ParticipantValero
ParticipantHy John
I don’t think it’s an Irving Kaye. Or the pillars are not original. In Mexico there were some models that had three stripes below. Maybe you should look there on the internet. Here I have the dimensions for the cutouts from a 6 jr. (junior) table. That was the smallest version. I think 75 x 45. I hope it helps you.regards, Valero
Valero
ParticipantAnd another higher No. 79613 from Brooklyn. Is an 8ft jr table.
Unfortunately no picture of the no. But from the table.regards Valero
Valero
ParticipantAnd then here’s a newer, deeper No. 6211 from Brooklyn. It is a 6ft table.
Valero
ParticipantHello – from Connecticut? I also have an 8ft jr from Stamford with the number KS-10726
Valero
ParticipantAlso, I have a rare little Apollo 6ft jr. found with the number 26066 from Brooklyn.
Valero
ParticipantI have a new higher number here. The 6ft table was made in Connecticut.
Incidentally, the Apollo No. 28677 no longer has any metal screws to connect to the upper corners of the Chrome. There are only cheap aluminum screws that tear off when you try to remove them :unsure: .
Valero
ParticipantI found a new higher serial number.
If someone has an even higher, then please enter here. Maybe I can use it to make a list of how many Apollo tables were built in which version.
Thanks in advance
Valero
ParticipantMachine feet are ideal for this. These hold great load are padded with rubber and have a round mount for the pin. Available in industrial accessories for lathes or milling machines. There are many different designs and many manufacturers.
Regards, ValeroAttachments:Valero
ParticipantThis is the smallest and largest device number I have found so far. Maybe you can bring so little light behind the production figures, which brings us all more information about these models. I found out that before the number 7362 the quality of the material was better, and after the number 9571 the materials used were much worse, but the workmanship for that was better.
Regards, ValeroAttachments:Valero
ParticipantMany thanks, Stephen! I hope for some resonance, if not here, where then. Because so far I had no luck with my research.
Regards, Valero -
AuthorPosts